What is the true nature of digital photography? Many people have this question long time ago. In fact, if people are wondering about the true nature of digital photography, usually to ask if there is art or science.
Here are some arguments for both sides:
A) art - many people consider digital photography as an art Elle can be used as an expression of feeling. They believeben that digitalesPor photos that are a continuation of the art of drawing or painting. You see, the digital photography, such as painting, because, although no clear picture of the reality that some changes through the various digital tools available.
Even without modification of the many people still believe that digital photography is the art by the fact that if you ave Louže eyes of an artist to find a major theme of the digitaln photography. The nature of digital photography, as art has something to do with the fact that the artist is capable of emotions and statements through visual subjects.
The proponents of the "artistic nature of digital photography" also argue their case to take into account their ability to transfer messages through the emotional aesthetics. The beauty of each image, of course, cravate the person certifying that the pictures. One of the strongestten arguments for the type of photography is künstlerischendigitale that the situation is very rare, what at first glance. Thanks to the camera and computer, a person can make the image to present what they want.
B) computer science - some people say that science is the true nature of digital photography. One argument is that photographieaphy, contrariamentein contrast to the painting, of something actually existing, and not mind or emotion painter. This practice can be veryrzeugendund because, in fact, a photographer has no photos. He or she simply pulls.
Otrosu other scientific argument on the nature of digital photography is that the persons concerned as a photographer and adjustments, based on a series of small steps that can be demonstrated scientifiquement. Gensqui advocate for the scientific nature of digital photography in May because of the same series of actions to be taken with the same resultati. There is a certain consistency in the quality of digital photography is a science.
But what is the true nature of digital photography? We have the various arguments for science and art. There is no solution for this problem, right?
The true nature of UFTogdes remain a paradox. This means that even if it as "art can also be used as a science. Where is the paradox of the nature of digital photography solved? Seinh, has been resolved, wenn a person a digital photo.
The true nature of digital photography are in the possession of the person who supplied the pictures. The way a person deals with the nature of the photo nudomento for him. There is no art nor science. The true nature of digital photography is a paradox. This may seem contradictory, but it is true that in any way.
Here are some arguments for both sides:
A) art - many people consider digital photography as an art Elle can be used as an expression of feeling. They believeben that digitalesPor photos that are a continuation of the art of drawing or painting. You see, the digital photography, such as painting, because, although no clear picture of the reality that some changes through the various digital tools available.
Even without modification of the many people still believe that digital photography is the art by the fact that if you ave Louže eyes of an artist to find a major theme of the digitaln photography. The nature of digital photography, as art has something to do with the fact that the artist is capable of emotions and statements through visual subjects.
The proponents of the "artistic nature of digital photography" also argue their case to take into account their ability to transfer messages through the emotional aesthetics. The beauty of each image, of course, cravate the person certifying that the pictures. One of the strongestten arguments for the type of photography is künstlerischendigitale that the situation is very rare, what at first glance. Thanks to the camera and computer, a person can make the image to present what they want.
B) computer science - some people say that science is the true nature of digital photography. One argument is that photographieaphy, contrariamentein contrast to the painting, of something actually existing, and not mind or emotion painter. This practice can be veryrzeugendund because, in fact, a photographer has no photos. He or she simply pulls.
Otrosu other scientific argument on the nature of digital photography is that the persons concerned as a photographer and adjustments, based on a series of small steps that can be demonstrated scientifiquement. Gensqui advocate for the scientific nature of digital photography in May because of the same series of actions to be taken with the same resultati. There is a certain consistency in the quality of digital photography is a science.
But what is the true nature of digital photography? We have the various arguments for science and art. There is no solution for this problem, right?
The true nature of UFTogdes remain a paradox. This means that even if it as "art can also be used as a science. Where is the paradox of the nature of digital photography solved? Seinh, has been resolved, wenn a person a digital photo.
The true nature of digital photography are in the possession of the person who supplied the pictures. The way a person deals with the nature of the photo nudomento for him. There is no art nor science. The true nature of digital photography is a paradox. This may seem contradictory, but it is true that in any way.
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น